Some mix of wrong and right, the exact proportions of which I’ll leave as an exercise to the reader.

  • warmaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    As an inexperienced user, I can tell you that Debian is way harder to use than most people think. Out of the box, the distro is pretty bare ones. I’m having a blast using an Arch based distro, but on Debian I had to do everything manually. Stable is freaking old, and Unstable has lots of limitations, Docker for example is a true pain.

    Ubuntu, Mint, Zorin, POP OS, are way better than Debian for users like me.

    • reddit_sux@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      Stable is freaking old and unstable.

      I ll give you old but not at all unstable, wonder what instability have you found in LTS.

      • Sir Aramis@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Pretty sure the whole statement is

        Stable is freaking old, and unstable has lots of limitations

        I don’t think they’re saying Debian LTS is unstable.

        • warmaster@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly what my bad wording meant to say. Thank you for your extraordinary reading comprehension.