-IGN 8 / 10

-PC Gamer 77 / 100

-GamesRadar +3.5 / 5

-TheSixthAxis 7 / 10

-Shacknews 9 / 10

-GamingTrend 100 / 100

-Wccftech 8.5 / 10

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 months ago

    To be clear, I’m not objecting to applying a license to content.

    I’m objecting to shoving a license in everyone’s face that’s bigger than the actual content.

    • Cosmic Cleric@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      To be clear, I’m not objecting to applying a license to content.

      I’m objecting to shoving a license in everyone’s face that’s bigger than the actual content.

      Originally, I just had the Creative Commons license number, with no description, but then someone was complaining about not knowing what that was.

      So then I changed it to just be a description of what it is, with no license number, but then someone was complaining about that.

      So then I had both at a regular font size, but someone was complaining about that, so I shrunk the font, to be less conspicuous.

      But then some Android/Apple clients don’t display the Lemmy subscript/superscript fonts formatting properly, and I get people telling me it looks ugly, so I have to tell them to get their UI clients devs to fix their client issues with fonts, or to use the web client UI.

      And finally, now, I have both the description and the license number in there, in a smaller font, and educating some people about their mobile clients formatting smaller fonts bugs, aaannnnndd, somebody’s still complaining about that.

      If it bothers you that much, Feel. Free. To. Block. Me.

      Anti Commercial-AI license (CC BY-NC-SA 4.0)