• tabular@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    50
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    In the “Statement from Linus” are LMG critising GN’s journalism for not reaching out before posting the video?

    Seems like a good thing to do but would LMG have gotten enough context regarding the prototype water block? Seems even now they think that review was fair while knowingly using the wrong GPU. Fair for who?

    • Freeman@lemmy.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Also he DIDNT “SELL” the prototype, he AUCTIONED it.

      Said my 7 year old this weekend, and linus.

      Seriously. Its excuses my kids use. “It was an accident”. “I misunderstood”. I didnt hit my brother, it was a love tap.

      • narp@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        Especially because Steve said “auctioned” and not “sold”. Nice strawman, same as his “bad journalism” take. It only leads the discussion away from the allegations.

        • FontMasterFlex@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          These sorts of folk ALWAYS think their viewers / fans are dumber than they are. They are the smartest person in the room, even if it’s just on a a screen.

      • themusicman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The distinction Linus was trying to make there was that the proceeds were going to a charity and not to his pockets, as “sell” might imply.

        Still a deflection, but not quite as infantile.

        • Freeman@lemmy.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Maybe but the point is it’s a distinction without a difference or in his own words “it doesn’t matter the outcome is still the same”

          He sold something that wasn’t his. If I donate my neighbors car to charity while it’s on loan to me, EVEN if I give him the money that was paid it’s still a dick move and illegal. And that is something that is replaceable with an actual market value.

          And in this case it’s a prototype that is 1 of 1. This move caused real damage to another person/company.

          Like I tell my kids “sorry doesn’t make it better or make things alright”. And in this case it straight up not good enough. Even a qualifier of “we put some controls in place to make sure this never happens again” is still not good enough. He’s not obsolved of the burden no matter how many times he claims he is.

        • Waldhuette@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Is it proven that the proceeds were going to charity ? Quite honestly I do not believe anything that LMG claims without proof at this point. Too much scummy behavior to give them any benefit of the doubt.

        • Vlyn@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          That doesn’t matter at all. I can’t steal something from you, then auction it off and say “All good, I gave the money to charity!”

          Especially when I can then write of that donation from my taxes on top.

          What you do with the money after selling it doesn’t actually matter.

      • tinsukE@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Wait a sec, I’m gonna create a bunch of bot accounts just to up vote this higher.

        *not gonna. I’m lazy, but it’d deserve it.