Plainclothes Chicago police officers fired nearly 100 gunshots over 41 seconds during a traffic stop that left one man dead and one officer injured, according to graphic video footage a police oversight agency released Tuesday.

Five officers from a tactical unit who were in an unmarked police vehicle surrounded an SUV last month driven by Dexter Reed, allegedly for failing to wear a seatbelt. Video shows the 26-year-old Black man briefly lowering a window and then raising it and refusing to exit the vehicle as more officers arrived, yelled commands and drew weapons.

  • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    Which is highly illegal.

    Better tell the criminals, they wouldn’t want to break the law.

    The cop-hate among ya’ll is insane.

    Let’s have a quick reality check here:
    What was the crime?
    How many police were involved?
    How armed were the police?
    Is that proportional to the crime?

    • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      7 months ago

      Suspected for illegal possession of a firearm, which I think any reasonable person would agree warrants an armed response.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 months ago

        Five officers from a tactical unit who were in an unmarked police vehicle surrounded an SUV last month driven by Dexter Reed, allegedly for failing to wear a seatbelt.

        Nothing in the article about an illegal firearm.

        I suppose if “suspected of having a firearm” justifies this kind of response, then police are always justified using this kind of response because who knows if they have a legalally obtained firearm?

          • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            7 months ago

            Was it illegally obtained? Or did he have the right to carry it?

            I’m confused, where are we on the 2nd amendment, do people have the right to guns or not?

            • Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              5
              ·
              7 months ago

              Some of the other commenters have said he had a record, and was not permitted to have a firearm.

              The officers definitely came expecting trouble.

              • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                5
                ·
                7 months ago

                The officers definitely came expecting trouble.

                For the reason of, according to the police, him not having a seatbelt on.

                If the police are that scared of someone not wearing a seatbelt, maybe just let him dive without a seatbelt. Seatbelt laws are for your own safety, and by all appearances he’s safer driving without a seatbelt than he is being pulled over by the police.