• oxjox@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    7 months ago

    I got into a debate about this with about four people a number of years ago. I was unable to convince them that merging at the merge point was more efficient. We all looked at each other like *wtf is wrong with your brain, how do you not understand this? * It’s one of those things that so obvious to me but I don’t know why - it’s just the definition of ‘chaos v. efficiency’ in my head.

    • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      But if we look at the bottle neck point - the point where traffic must be 1 lane - as long as that is moving at the same rate what is the difference if cars merge sooner or later? We’re still getting the same number of cars per minute through the 1 lane section of road.

      If there is an alternate turnoff that is being blocked by the traffic then yes I can see it. Otherwise I don’t see how it makes any difference.