• candybrie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 months ago

    “Also” doesn’t make sense in context.

    I think this miscommunication is more on you for taking it as an attack towards yourself when it was pretty clearly suspicious towards at&t, not you. In the future, I suggest trying to read things as charitably as possible. It will make forums a much more pleasant place if you don’t immediately assume aggression based on pretty innocuous words.

    • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      I didn’t see it as an attack. I saw it as very poor communication. “Also” would have worked way better as it would have been a “yes, and” instead of a literal “but.” I’m all about charitable readings. That’s why I didn’t attack them but pointed out their choice in wording. It was, as pointed out, snarky, not defensive.

      • candybrie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        At&t lost a bunch of people’s SSNs

        Why do they even have SSNs to lose?

        To check for terrorism

        (Also/but) that doesn’t mean they need to store it.

        Be honest. Which word actually makes sense?

        • FauxPseudo @lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 months ago

          Unless extra words are added to show they are disagreeing with the practice instead of my comment then “also” is the best choice.