The monotheistic all powerful one.

  • Susaga@ttrpg.network
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 months ago

    I find it funny that you directly quoted wikipedia to write that (exact wording from the paradox article, I checked), but ignored the sentence immediately before it (…or a statement that runs contrary to one’s expectation). Also, the linked articles at the bottom include the unexpected hanging page. Maybe read the entire wiki page before citing it?

    Also, in case wikipedia suddenly isn’t enough, here’s an article on wolfram to back me up: https://mathworld.wolfram.com/UnexpectedHangingParadox.html

    • z00s@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      It doesn’t “back you up” at all, it simply restates the paradox. Maybe learn how to argue?

      When you get to the point where you’re nitpicking sources, you’re admitting that you have no substantive argument available.