I ask because I like console, but at the same time have difficulties remembering all the commands. I’d like to try a GUI that is comfortable to use with only a keyboard.
[edit]
My inbox got fediversized, fantastic feeling.

    • BentiGorlich@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I am using it too and I love it. I only know source tree as a competitor and in comparision it sucks…

      You dont have to pay for it, even when using it comercially (unpess they changed that)

  • exu@feditown.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Magit with emacs (doom emacs to be fully honest). More a TUI, but definitely fully keyboard driven :)

  • priapus@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use Lazygit, which is a TUI. It is entirely controlled by keyboard shortcuts and has a lot of quick ways to do tedious things.

    • Viktorian@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 year ago

      +1 for Lazygit. It doesn’t cover all of my needs so I have to use the CLI for a few small things, but for 99% of your typical git usage this tool is such a gift.

      • dmrzl@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m curious: what’s missing for you?

        I needed a few smaller features (like rebasing onto any commit, not just HEAD) and found the code quite easy to adapt to my needs (had to take half a day to learn Go first though).

        A proper gerrit integration would be awesome though.

        What’s lacking for you and where did you end up tool-wise?

  • s_w@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    I use IntelliJ’s built-in git GUI.

    I don’t understand why people use command line only. Sure, learn the commands so if you need to use them you can, but most GUIs are far more feature rich than command line. With IntelliJ, I can easily view differences before committing, have it do code quality scans, automatically clean up any code it can, more easily choose which files I want to commit vs the typical ‘git add .’ I see most people do with command line, have separate changelists when pair programming, and much more.

    One argument that continually comes up is that command line is faster. I completely disagree. If I want to just commit the code without reviewing it, I can use 2 hot keys and the code is committed and pushed. But as I do a quick readthrough of all the code first and review issues from the code quality analysis it does take more time, but still less than it would to do comparable things with command line.

    • pinkpatrol@anarch.is
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m a heavy intellij user, but the git log UI always confuses me. When I open ‘git log’ via the action menu IntelliJ doesn’t focus my current branch. I am not sure if there’s some other menu I’m supposed to use to achieve that.

      I do use the commit local changes, pull changes, merge branches functionality a good bit. My only feedback there is that I haven’t found a way to quickly commit changes without running git hooks. Each time it requires me to open up the gear icon and deselect ‘git hooks’. This is slower than using the command line where I can write git commit --no-verify and repeat the same command again and again. I know it’s a niche need, but it’s necessary for testing a rather archaic system we maintain.