Democrats and voting advocates are going on the offensive against the Trump administration’s threats to send armed federal agents to the polls as voters cast their ballots in the 2026 midterm elections.

Federal law bans armed civil or military officers from voting locations, but administration officials have repeatedly suggested they could still be deployed.

With Election Day just over a month away, Democrats and civic groups have filed two lawsuits that aim to bar federal law enforcement at the polls. Meanwhile, Sen. Tammy Baldwin (D-Wisc.) on Wednesday introduced a bill to restrict them from coming within a quarter-mile of voting sites, and some states have advanced their own protections.

The Baldwin measure, in particular — though unlikely to pass into law — suggests Democrats are looking not just to head off any attempt to deploy law enforcement to voting sites themselves, but also to focus attention on what may be an even bigger threat to voting access: potential efforts to snarl traffic and create broader disruptions in urban, Democratic-leaning areas that could make it harder for voters to get to the polls in the first place.

Taken together, the lawsuits and legislation amount to a growing campaign to resist one of the Trump administration’s most alarming threats to the election.

  • Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    21 hours ago

    Hey, question from a non-American. Can your president simply say, “I don’t accept the results of this election” and declare it to be null and void or in abeyance?

    • ManOMorphos@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      20 hours ago

      There is no “legal” mechanism for this. States run the elections and send their representatives directly in the new session of Congress, independently from any executive branch office. The president isn’t supposed to have a say in which or how many representatives can start the new term of Congress.

      As for what Trump would actually do regardless of the laws to potentially change or stop a new Congress, no one knows for sure. It would probably be a new level of constitutional crisis if he did try to illegally change or stop the new Congress.

  • Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    Democrats could have kept trump from ever being in power by releasing all kinds of damning info about him since everyone already knew he was a sex trafficker.

    Democrats could have had him removed after impeachment the first term with high crimes and treason. They could have used the 25th amendment too.

    Democrats could have used committee positions and procedural tricks like the GOO to stall bills and sabatoage any productive actions.

    Democrats could have kept trump from office after January 6th and the fake elector scheme

    Democrats could have had him removed for high crimes and treason the second term.

    Democrats could have stopped him from illegally destroying the Whitehouse and building a six story bunker with an AI data center and drone airport which will be surrounded by sniper towers.

    Democrats could have him removed after the many times that he threatened to nuke a civilization.

    Democrats could have removed him when he destroyed the UN and NATO and changed our allies relationships forever.

    Democrats could have removed him when he committed warcrimes in Iran and South America and now we are under investigation for warcrimes by the ICC and UN. The first investigator was murdered in broad daylight.

    So now, to prep for the midterms,

    Hakeem is meeting with Jared Kushner secretly AIPAC Dems are funding aipac Republicans over DSA candidates. (BlUe No MaTtEr WhO) Tammy duckworth is saying that if we win, we shouldn’t waste time on impeachment so we can move forward and “compromise” with MAGA

    If anyone or anything could stop what’s happening, it would have happened by now.

    He won’t accept the results and there isn’t anyone who will enforce the law.

    Please post who will enforce the election results if you disagree

    • FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      16 hours ago

      Some people are still convinced the law is some natural force that will simply happen without enforcement

    • Tony Bark@pawb.socialOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Democrats could have kept trump from ever being in power by releasing all kinds of damning info about him since everyone already knew he was a sex trafficker.

      I don’t know if that we would have worked or not. The GOP had every opportunity to remove Trump when he basically committed treason by asking for Russia to get Hillary’s emails on live TV.

      • Yuccagnocchiyaki@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Agreed. I’m just saying that we don’t have an opposition party.

        Hakeem Jeffries is funded by a Peter Thiel and just appointed more dem Thiel agents into some AI regulatory committee.

        The Dems want to “compromise”

        I won’t ever compromise with fascists. What does that even mean? Are we good with 30000 people in a camp instead of 60000? Will we let pedophiles use “just the tip”?

        How do you compromise with pedophilic fascists? You don’t because they CANNOT exist in a normal society

  • dan1101@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 day ago

    Early vote in person if you can. It doesn’t all need to be done on election day, much less crowded now and the corrupt feds can’t be there every day from now until November.

    If you do see armed terrorists hanging around a call to the police saying you don’t feel safe might be an interesting test of local law enforcement.

  • danc4498@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    My supreme court prediction: we can’t decide anything because the Trump administration hasn’t actually sent anybody to the polls. Wait till Election Day and we will make a decision after a complaint makes its way back up to the Supreme Court.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 day ago

    The real question is, who’s going to enforce this? They’re gonna deploy the local PD to face off against a lawless nameless heavily armed federal military force?

    • cranakis@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I just decided. I’m going to start blocking dicks like you each time I see one of these, 0 input, “fuck America” replies. You’re not adding anything to the discussion. You’re first!

      • Auli@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Might block me but why shouldn’t the world say fuck america? I mean your president and politicians have threatened to take over my country multiple times. As stated above you have changed relationship with alias for at least awhile don’t expect it to go back to “normal”. If it does the west should just officially become part of America I know as it is right now they can’t function without them. How many governments are on American platforms around the world. The largest spy network and people pay them to use it.

      • ouRKaoS@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        I don’t block people, I just tag them with a 💩 or 🤡 emoji so I know they aren’t worth dealing with.

  • trainsrkool@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    Libs: oh you better not! we need to vote because that will work against you! wags finger

    remember to “vote” this nov! your choices are bluemaga and maga, hav fun!