• emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    8 months ago

    Cats survived before us by hunting small mammals and small birds, and they are very effective at getting fed.

    And, conversely, the prey evolved to avoid cats. So it is only a problem if you take cats to a place that historically did not have them. In fact, removing a predator from an ecosystem it used to keep under check can be just as devastating as introducing a foreign species.

      • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        8 months ago

        As you yourself said, cats have been living across most of Africa, Asia and Europe for over a thousand years. So unless you are talking about Australia, the Americas, or a few corners of the old world, cats are either native or naturalised enough that they are now a part of the ecosystem.

          • emergencyfood@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            5
            ·
            edit-2
            8 months ago

            It depends on the ecosystem. Pollution famously caused certain moths to shift from being mostly light-coloured to mostly dark-coloured in a matter of years. The removal and reintroduction of wolves in Yellowstone caused observable changes in prey behaviour within a decade or so. Of course longer-lived species like trees take much longer to adapt, but we’re talking about birds, geckos and rodents here.

            Edit: Also, most geckos, birds and rodents are r-strategists, meaning they are limited more by food than by predation.

        • XIIIesq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          8 months ago

          The absolute brain-dead mentality of the people who will just downvote anything that doesn’t fit their predetermined conclusion.