I’m politically agnostic and have moved from a slightly conservative stance to a vastly more progressive stance (european). i still dont get the more niche things like tankies and anarchists at this point but I would like to, without spending 10 hours reading endless manifests (which do have merit, no doubt, but still).

Can someone explain to me why anarchy isnt the guy (or gal, or gang, or entity) with the bigger stick making the rules?

  • TORFdot0@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    10 months ago

    At that point, it isn’t anarchy as a “representative community council” with the power of enforcement is just another name for “state power”.

    Of course I don’t think anarchy can truly exist in anything but hunter-gatherer societies either so it is a moot point.