• Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    10 months ago

    Could (a) god(s) exist? Possibly, it’s hard to rule out the supernatural in natural terms since it’s SUPERnatural

    Could the universe be a simulation? Possible too, but also on of those things that’s almost impossible to prove.

    At the same time, it could be that your e a Boltzmann brain, and that literally nothing existed before and that your brain just kinda formed together spontaneously with all your memories.

    All those are possible options that are over 99% likely to be false, but their cooouuullldd be true.

    Point is not to rearrange your life on the off changlce that one of those are true. Especially religion, since religions tend to be “believe our particular god(s) or you go to hell for eternity” followed closely by “if you don’t believe our particular god(s) we will help you go to hell right now”. Nearly all human conflicts in Earth’s history were either based on religion or used religion as a tool to whip up the masses to go kill the others.

    There are also hundreds of Gods and over 3000 different religious figures out there and they’re all pretty much exclusive or, they all claim to be the right one and the rest is wrong. Bold claim to make when it’s all based off goat herders texts that were first abused for a completely different god (hello, Christianity!) and constantly conflicts with each other.

    Simulation theory and Boltzman brain ideas are fun to entertain and talk and think about, but they’ve never been used to control who can love and have sex with who, they’ve never been a used whereas religion just IS abuse and control in every way possible.

    I do not like religion

    • ADTJ@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Agree with most of what you said except the “over 99% likely to be false”.

      Like you mentioned it’s not possible to prove either way so it isn’t meaningful to describe it as likely or unlikely. We have no way of knowing (at least currently) so the likelihood is simply undefined

      • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Eh, we can prove that human DNA is 99% primate and that there was no great flood. Seems unlikely to me.

        • ADTJ@feddit.uk
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          It sounds like you’re referring specifically to Christian theology but the comment was just about whether a god or gods exist in general

            • ADTJ@feddit.uk
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              We’re not talking about creationism or any particular brand of theism

                • ADTJ@feddit.uk
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  edit-2
                  10 months ago

                  I understand your point and I feel like maybe I’m sounding a little argumentative. Sorry let me try to be more clear.

                  I understand your argument is that genetic evidence disproves existing religious beliefs that people have but that’s a different argument to the point I was making.

                  Even if all global religions are incorrect, that doesn’t mean that a god or gods couldn’t hypothetically exist and my point is that there is no demonstrative proof of that either way.

                  If you check the original comment again, the question was about whether “a god(s) exist” and up until they mentioned the 99% that I was disputing, religion didn’t even come into it.

                  You could disprove every creationist claim, every anti-evolution argument, and you’d be right, but you can’t settle the question of “whether a supernatural being exists” because there simply isn’t a way to do that within the natural realm that we know of.

                  It isn’t just about God either. The simulation and Boltzmann brain hypotheses are similarly immeasurable

                  • stonedemoman@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    2
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    They aren’t immeasurable. The reason you think I’m making a different argument to your point is that you’re asking for every negative proof. This is never going to provide an answer, as it would be a competition to dispel the imagination.

                    Hypotheses and positive proofs are slowly answering the question of why we’re here. We know that evolution is likely, DNA is irrefutable evidence. We know that it’s likely our known universe began with a singularity because of the background microwave radiation accelerating away from a point of origin. We know the field and corresponding particle that gave matter its properties from the particle acceleration tests by CERN.

                    It becomes a much different question when one is not only seeking answers that fit their beliefs.