• null@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yup, thus fragmenting the crap out of the fediverse (the last E)

        • null@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          If you see massive fragmentation as a feature then I really don’t know what to tell you.

          I guess enjoy?

          • ampersandrew@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            11 months ago

            I’m a Linux user. That “fragmentation” is probably a good reason for why that hasn’t been extinguished either. So as far as I can tell, yes, I’ll enjoy the resilience that that implies without fear of it being extinguished.

            • null@slrpnk.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              I really don’t think that’s a meaningful comparison.

              Federation relies on unity – fragmentation ruins that.

              • ampersandrew@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                Well, you can stick to instances that federate with Threads even if/when they misbehave then, but having the option not to is pretty great, from my perspective.

                • null@slrpnk.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  Sure, that’s great while it’s still just “instances that do federate with threads” and “instances that don’t federate with threads”.