• pyrflie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      8 months ago

      Sometimes the winner is so far out of the park it’s measured with an astrolabe. The margin of error being so insignificant to be irrelevant to the equation.

    • ikidd@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      8 months ago

      Because why would you when proton exists? I said this at the start of proton being announced and was told I was stupid for thinking native gaming on Linux would suffer. Its pretty fucking obvious now, isn’t it?

      • lud@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 months ago

        I prefer the way it is not compared to earlier.

        Sure maybe some games will stop having native ports, but a LOT of other games will be possible to play at all. If the performance is the same, does it really matter?

        • ikidd@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          8 months ago

          Oh, you aren’t wrong. But to sit back and say Proton wasn’t going to cripple native gaming was pretty dumb. But it was a /r/linuxgaming groupthink that couldn’t be contradicted at the time.

        • nutbutter@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          8 months ago

          I recently played Witcher 2 and Shadow of the Tomb Raider, and played them both ways, native linux version and using proton, Linux was slightly better, proton had a few graphical issues. I would say a native Linux version is almoat better.

          • lud@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            8 months ago

            Sure, but 99% of the time it’s that or nothing at all.