DISCLAIMER: this is not my content that was removed, I just came across it in the modlog and found it to be absurd. If it’s not allowed, I totally understand.
Reason removed was because it’s unrelated.
Unrelated……
The guy was illegally deported without due process. And yet for some reason, suggesting so is somehow “unrelated” to a meme that is trying to say that because he is affiliated (no charges were ever filed against him for gang-related activity) with a gang, he is by default, guilty.
What’s ironic, is that the entire point of the meme is that the bullshit about him being in MS-13 is unrelated to the fact that people want accountability for this administration illegally deporting a man without due process.
This mod has definitely chosen the correct name.
And even taken into consideration that the instance is essentially a troll haven for wayward 4Chan refugees, they should still have to adhere to the rules of common sense.
Number of times Unruffled has advocated for the solution of attending any of the protests going on right now: As far as I can tell, 0
Number of times Unruffled has advocated for the solution of not voting for Democrats: Jesus Christ I think I’m going to puke
Who is unruffled?
They’re the person you’re speaking to, when you asked “Has no one told you how voting works” et cetera.
An absence of evidence is just that. I haven’t posted in support of libraries either. Does that mean I’m anti-books? You are using fundamentally flawed logic.
The reason I have a hate boner for the Democrats is because they handed the election to Trump. And because they refuse to change course, except to slide more to the right to chase those precious Republican votes. Their only actually progressive members are routinely undermined by the party leadership and sidelined in favour of neo liberal types. So yes, you have “proven” the bleeding obvious, well done. It’s not like I’ve tried to hide my opinions lmao.
“I hate that this building’s on fire, therefore I am fistfighting the firefighters. After all, they’re not doing a good enough job.” (Which, yes, I agree with you 100% that they are not.)
“Bro why are you bringing up fire extinguishers? I haven’t said anything about them, no. Why would that be important?”
I don’t get the analogy. Who are the firefighters supposed to represent?
A more accurate analogy would be that the Democrats were responsible for the building’s fire safety, but they were given a big donation by a company that provides for-profit fire services, so they decided to outsource it. Then the private fire company keeps reducing services, raising prices, and cutting staff to make more profit. The tenants all complain, but the Democrats refuse to accept feedback or to cancel the contract. Then one day, the Republicans are voted in charge, because the tenants are so fed up with the management of the Democrats. The Republicans award the contract to another company on even worse terms, because the owner made a big donation to their campaign. They also couldn’t give a shit about the tenants. One day, the building burns down. The Democrats tell the surviving tenants that they should have voted for the lesser evil because they would (maybe) have been better off. That’s where we are now.
Oh, I think you do.
You proceeded to tell an alternate analogy with the people they were supposed to represent instead moved to someone else in the analogy…