Exciting news for who? Only the site owner is excited that a free resource now requires a subscription

“Yay! Now I have to pay another subscription! I’m so excited! Let’s celebrate with them!” - nobody

  • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    15
    ·
    1 year ago

    Electricity aint exactly free. Even if the data they store is minuscule. Servers will pull >300w if you store 10gb or 2000gb.

        • LufyCZ@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          You know what?

          If you gave me a datadump and a docker image, I’d host it, for free.

          Insane I know

      • Appoxo@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        If a server costs X and the amount of free users is Y and VIP is Z then you’d need to create an equilibrium where you can make more money to sustain the infrastructure and have enough in case it goes belly up.
        Aka: If 10k users are free, and the income from VIP or ads is Z then you have to limit the capabilities of the free users to sustain the platform which in turn can stay (to some anount) free because the VIPs pay for it.
        Means: Limit API calls.