The Funkwhale music platform is alive and in active development, and they’re working on a feature to filter far-right artists off the network. Some Fediverse self-hosters are divided on letting a third party decide what should be allowed in their library.

  • Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I thought funkwhale was dead. Well thats neat.

    Also I think it’ll be pretty interesting what they deem as alt-right. Lotta country music’s gonna get banned.

  • _edge@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    I support that fight against Nazi content, but hard-coded blacklists in a open-source Fediverse software? Something is off here.

    Hope they find a better way. Make it the default behaviour, include it in all tutorials, defederate.

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yeah I like being able to opt-in to a specific block list, or having it enabled by default but individual instances can disable it (more to neutralize bad faith arguments from trolls who want to normalize nazism), even though I want it effectively banned.

    • comfy@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      On the other hand, open-source software enables one to disable or edit those blocklists with a simple patch. It’s just an extreme way of making it the default behavior, and therefore making their political statement stronger.

      There might be a better way, but I’m not really concerned with this implementation.

      • catloaf@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Not just a patch, you also have to set up the build chain to compile it.

        • comfy@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          2 days ago

          Ah yes, I forgot about that (I’ve mostly been using scripting-langage web apps)

  • catloaf@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    So all I have to do to fuck with Funkwhale users is tag some popular artists on a different site?

    • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s like 6 or 7 tags that all have the word “nazi” or “white power” in the tag. As long as Sam Hunt tracks are not being encoded that way he should be good.

  • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    3 days ago

    Yeah, I don’t even know how you would do that but if a platform I’m hosting and managing tries to tell me what content is or isn’t permissable it’s going in the bin.

    Don’t need some big brother crap on my system controlling what I do with my hardware.

    • beleza pura@lemmy.eco.br
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      they aren’t controlling what you do, though. they’re just refusing to enable far-right content. software isn’t a natural right that is taken away when someone refuses to help you do what you want. it is a fruit of labor that enables you to do something you wouldn’t be able to do otherwise

      • Monkey With A Shell@lemmy.socdojo.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        3 days ago

        Right, but for them to do so requires a level of monitoring what you use and open piece of software for, which is unacceptable to me. If you had an old style mp3 player that refused to play certain songs it would be seen as broken at best. If that selection of songs got updated at the discretion of some third party you start walking into ministry of truth territory.

        This is different from something like YouTube or whatever hosted service refusing to platform content, this would cross into directly controlling personal consumption by forced removal. We call it bad when people start banning books, but it’s ok so long as it’s our person selecting the bans?

        The existence of Mien Kamph in a library’s collection doesn’t make the librarian a Nazi, and it doesn’t force the content onto the public.

        • frozenspinach@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          that refused to play certain songs

          Nazism songs.

          The existence of Mien Kamph in a library’s collection doesn’t make the librarian a Nazi,

          No but 100 copies of back issues of “Being A Nazi In 2025 The Magazine” probably would, and the present case is more like the latter.