Summary

Conservative lawmakers and activists are pushing to overturn Obergefell v. Hodges, the 2015 Supreme Court ruling legalizing same-sex marriage. Liberty Counsel’s Mat Staver declared, “It’s just a matter of when.”

Some legislators, like Oklahoma Senator David Bullard, are introducing bills to challenge the ruling, while Justices Thomas and Alito have signaled interest in reconsidering it.

Though most Americans support same-sex marriage, the court’s conservative shift is concerning.

The 2022 Respect for Marriage Act ensures federal recognition but does not prevent states from restricting same-sex marriage if Obergefell is overturned.

  • Noxy@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Marriage is not a “contract”. The legal benefits and rights that you mentioned aren’t possible with just a contract between the married couple.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        48 minutes ago

        My same-sex marriage ceremony occurred in a judge’s chambers, nothing religious whatsoever. My husband and I are both very much atheist and would not have allowed any religious bullshit in our marriage.

        It’s more accurate to say that the IRS allows us to jointly file taxes once married. If we’re unmarried the IRS wouldn’t allow that. The benefit of filing jointly isn’t granted because of a “contract” between my husband and I, the benefit was already there and waiting for us to become eligible by getting married.

    • earphone843@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 hours ago

      What the actual fuck are you talking about? The rights I mentioned aren’t possible just because a priest says so. The contract is what makes them possible.

      • Noxy@pawb.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        52 minutes ago

        I didn’t say anything about priests. No priest involved in my same-sex marriage. I’m not addressing religion at all here.

        Legally, marriage is not simply a contract between the two married people.

        For example, hospital visitation. If marriage is nothing more than a legal contract between my husband and I, how could it possibly compel a hospital to allow my husband to visit me if I’m hospitalized? The hospital didn’t agree to anything in our contract, so how else are they compelled?

        My entire point is that marriage has legal benefits that go far beyond what a mere contract between two married parties can possibly grant.