• schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      44
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      Hopefully the Mastodon devs are paying attention to the features that bsky has that they don’t, and actually copy them rather than sit there and tell everyone that no, they’re wrong they don’t want that feature.

      I want to like Mastodon (or any platforms that are federated with them and trying very hard to be them) but they’re utter and total lack of interest in and development of features the community keeps asking for is going to keep it a niche option for weirdos while people keep hopping into corpo social platform after corpo social platform.

      • mesamune@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        6 hours ago

        The mastodon developers are us.

        It’s open source so yeah…my PRS are part of the community. And so are yours. And projects like GoToSocial make it seemless if someone wants to implement the same protocol in a slightly different way.

        • leisesprecher@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          5 hours ago

          The mastodon devs decide what to merge, though. If they don’t see the value of a feature, they won’t merge it.

          If you want to extend the protocol, sure, go ahead. But you’ll be alone on it, since no one outside of your protocol island can use that specific feature.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          14
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          inb4 “it’s not my job to contribute to a community project when there’s a slick corporate alternative” which is basically just saying “it’s not my job to make the world a better place.” (Actually that’s everyone’s job, all the time.)

          “Wahhhh, I shouldn’t have to learn to code, or garden, or be a street medic, or learn to do anything to take care of other people ever. I should have it all spoon-fed to me by corporations that don’t give a fuck if I live or die!”

          And yet there are somehow those of us who have the audacity to call Boomers lazy and entitled. We’re obviously no fucking better.

  • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Bluesky’s moderation team is shit. Recently, their “head of trust and safety” went full Elongated Muskrat and tried to permanently ban a user who was tracking his public data.

    • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Told people already it’s not as decentralized as people might believe or has being told to them. I will never join Bluesky.

      • Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Gonna be real, microblogging is never gonna really work with decentralization. It barely works when centralized. It’s isolating by nature, and only really amplifies the voices that are already the loudest, and the introduction of separate servers and federation delays only make those problems worse.

      • MrSpArkle@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        Decentralization is is unobtainable. You have to have a source of truth. DNS has shown us the way, everyone else is fucking around.

        Gotta have a trusted org to manage identities.

        • melroy@kbin.melroy.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          30 minutes ago

          Yesn’t. Yes we have DNS, which is bad enough. But the internet itself was build to be resistant and distributed. DNS is distributed, but not decentralized. However, decentralized protocols (read BitTorrent protocols, etc.) do exist, and does make it more decentralized. Without the need of DNS.

          I’m never doing to trust a single org or group to control a large group of users/people or projects. Never.

    • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      7 hours ago

      If anyone truly thought this group of techbros that was spearheaded and organized by Jack Dorsey was gonna somehow be different than the previous iterations, I’ve got a bridge to sell them. I mean, they owe millions to Blockchain Capital. Cryptobros. But sure, we just need to keep making more billionaires and then ditching their services after they have enough money to deeply influence politics.

      Idiots acting like they’re against people like Musk but they’re just creating another one at a different company.

      • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        6 hours ago

        they’re not creating “another one”. Dorsey is already made and he seems to be immune to whatever is working elon’s intestines.

        ps i don’t care a bit about Dorsey either. I just see a difference.

        • Snot Flickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Dorsey already left Bluesky back to Xitter because he didn’t like their moderation practices. I’m talking about Jay Graber, who literally got their start developing Zcash, a cryptocurrency. Graber is far from a billionaire at the moment.

          • merde alors@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            6 hours ago

            Dorsey went back to Xitter!

            Why would he do that 🤦

            sorry, ignore my previous comment. This too! I need to read a little on this now. Apparently i missed that move

            edit: reading this ☞ https://www.piratewires.com/p/interview-with-jack-dorsey-mike-solana

            This tool was designed such that it had, you know, it was a base level protocol. It had a reference app on top. It was designed to be controlled by the people. I think the greatest idea — which we need — is an algorithm store, where you choose how you see all the conversations. But little by little, they started asking Jay and the team for moderation tools, and to kick people off. And unfortunately they followed through with it.

            That was the second moment I thought, uh, nope. This is literally repeating all the mistakes we made as a company. This is not a protocol that’s truly decentralized. It’s another app. It’s another app that’s just kind of following in Twitter’s footsteps, but for a different part of the population.

            Everything we wanted around decentralization, everything we wanted in terms of an open source protocol, suddenly became a company with VCs and a board. That’s not what I wanted, that’s not what I intended to help create.

            Around the same time, I found Nostr. We don’t know who the leader is, it’s like this anonymous Brazilian. It has no board, no company behind it, no funding. It’s a truly open protocol. The development environment is moving fast. And I gave a bunch of money to them.

            Day by day, I learned that this was actually the path. It emerged from something that was not Twitter-driven, it was a reaction to Twitter’s failures, and I thought that was right as well. That’s what I should help, and that’s what I should support.

            So I just decided to delete my account on Bluesky, and really focus on Nostr, and funding that to the best of my ability. I asked to get off the board as well, because I just don’t think a protocol needs a board or wants a board. And if it has a board, that’s not the thing that I wanted to help build or wanted to help fund.

            this sounds alright, no?

            • Alex@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              4 hours ago

              But little by little, they started asking Jay and the team for moderation tools, and to kick people off. And unfortunately they followed through with it.

              This bit I don’t get. Even on Lemmy and Mastodon we need moderation tools and arguably the current provisions aren’t fit for purpose. It’s not something that can just be pushed to the individual users and most hobbyists who want to spin up public servers don’t want to be spending their time wading through reports and CSAM. How to provide a safe environment for users is still an unsolved problem in the fediverse so it’s no wonder people drift to corporate controlled servers which say least nominally have the resources to do something about it.