Hello World,

following feedback we have received in the last few days, both from users and moderators, we are making some changes to clarify our ToS.

Before we get to the changes, we want to remind everyone that we are not a (US) free speech instance. We are not located in US, which means different laws apply. As written in our ToS, we’re primarily subject to Dutch, Finnish and German laws. Additionally, it is our discretion to further limit discussion that we don’t consider tolerable. There are plenty other websites out there hosted in US and promoting free speech on their platform. You should be aware that even free speech in US does not cover true threats of violence.

Having said that, we have seen a lot of comments removed referring to our ToS, which were not explicitly intended to be covered by our ToS. After discussion with some of our moderators we have determined there to be both an issue with the ambiguity of our ToS to some extent, but also lack of clarity on what we expect from our moderators.

We want to clarify that, when moderators believe certain parts of our ToS do not appropriately cover a specific situation, they are welcome to bring these issues up with our admin team for review, escalating the issue without taking action themselves when in doubt. We also allow for moderator discretion in a lot of cases, as we generally don’t review each individual report or moderator action unless they’re specifically brought to admin attention. This also means that content that may be permitted by ToS can at the same time be violating community rules and therefore result in moderator action. We have added a new section to our ToS to clarify what we expect from moderators.

We are generally aiming to avoid content organizing, glorifying or suggesting to harm people or animals, but we are limiting the scope of our ToS to build the minimum framework inside which we all can have discussions, leaving a broader area for moderators to decide what is and isn’t allowed in the communities they oversee. We trust the moderators judgement and in cases where we see a gross disagreement between moderatos and admins’ criteria we can have a conversation and reach an agreement, as in many cases the decision is case-specific and context matters.

We have previously asked moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification when this was suggested in context of murder or other violent crimes. Following a discussion in our team we want to clarify that we are no longer requesting moderators to remove content relating to jury nullification in the context of violent crimes when the crime in question already happened. We will still consider suggestions of jury nullification for crimes that have not (yet) happened as advocation for violence, which is violating our terms of service.

As always, if you stumble across content that appears to be violating our site or community rules, please use Lemmys report functionality. Especially when threads are very active, moderators will not be able to go through every single comment for review. Reporting content and providing accurate reasons for reports will help moderators deal with problematic content in a reasonable amount of time.

  • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.orgEnglish
    21·
    13 days ago

    Don’t skip the bit about how many people often do not read the TOS or EULA. That’s important to what I am saying.

    The vast majority of the people on LW probably do not care. We see a lot of people announcing they are changing instances in this thread, but I would be surprised to see more than a few dozens actually do it, inertia is a thing, and a good portion of the people seem to think the changes are reasonable.

    I was literally told when asking about Lemmy instances that lemmy.world was THE recommendation for instances specifically because it was so large and active as a result.

    You created your account in 2023, when LW was a few weeks old, as well as most of the other instances. There was no way for people to know that this kind of issues would arise, at the time the ToS probably didn’t even exist.

    Recommendations nowadays usually suggest Lemm.ee or discuss.online, as LW has become too large, and every decision they make have an impact on Lemmy as a whole, such as this one.

    Like it or not lemmy.world is a jumping off point for lots of users, plenty of whom move on to other instances (some of which may be an instance more local to them).

    But if they move to another instance, then the LW rules don’t apply to them anymore, so no need to change the sign up page?

    • atrielienz@lemmy.worldEnglish
      11·
      13 days ago

      But if they move to another instance, then the LW rules don’t apply to them anymore, so no need to change the sign up page?<<

      You said it yourself. Inertia is a thing. Some people move on. Some people don’t and probably won’t.

      Clarity is important if we’re talking about enforcing a TOS to comply with the law. Especially when the average Lemmy instance owner doesn’t just have a team of lawyers on retainer.

      The point I’m making though is a lot of people (perhaps myself included) wouldn’t have come to lemmy.world at all if they had known that they’d be beholden to laws they had never even heard of and aren’t normally subject to in their daily lives.

      I don’t think what I’m suggesting (I’m not pushing to enact the stuff I suggested) is all that unreasonable. But of course it’s not up to me, and probably not even up to the majority of Lemmy.world users.

      But the .world part of the name is something of a misnomer if you consider how confusing it may be to new users, especially if this is their first foray into the fediverse.

      I haven’t decided it’s worth the time to vet another instance to move to and transfer everything I have set up over to that new instance.

      Though this wasn’t handled the way I would have personally handled it, I’m largely not too bothered about the changes because I’m unlikely to ever run afoul of them.

      Even though I absolutely believe that karma is a thing, and you get out of the world what you put into it, at the end of the day I’m not on Lemmy (or any other platforms) to advocate for the death of people. Probably the closest I have ever gotten is saying something like “eat the rich” and that’s meant to be taken as having a healthy dose of sarcasm.

      • Blaze (he/him)@feddit.orgEnglish
        2·
        13 days ago

        The point I’m making though is a lot of people (perhaps myself included) wouldn’t have come to lemmy.world at all if they had known that they’d be beholden to laws they had never even heard of and aren’t normally subject to in their daily lives.

        Where would you have gone? Discuss.online and lemmy.today did not exist in August 2023. Also, do you always assume that every website on the Internet is hosted in the USA?

        Also, LW is by far the biggest instance, both in terms of users and communities, are people really going to go to another instance just to avoid European laws?

        Though this wasn’t handled the way I would have personally handled it, I’m largely not too bothered about the changes because I’m unlikely to ever run afoul of them.

        Indeed, and that’s probably the case of the vast majority of the LW users.

        For people wanting to move instances, making the ToS more explicit about the laws applicable is not going to change their minds, they are going to move anyway.

        That’s why I don’t see who this change would impact.

        • atrielienz@lemmy.worldEnglish
          1·
          13 days ago

          But my initial comment was the one you took umbridge to. And that original comment involved it being confusing for new users. So regardless of whether there were alternatives at the time I signed up or not, and regardless of whether people will move or would choose another instance if they knew, the point that it is confusing still stands and you haven’t really successfully argued that it’s not confusing.

          Also, there are other fediverse projects besides Lemmy. Perhaps I would have gone to one of those before coming to Lemmy.

          If you don’t think that people naturally assume that their Internet usage will be subject to their local laws, you’re missing the point entirely. People don’t think that using the internet and making statements that are legal where they live will get them in trouble with law enforcement entities the world over and they definitely don’t think that they will get other people in trouble with local authorities in some other country. They don’t think about this at all. There is an inherent assumption being made and it’s not that the website itself is American or German or Chinese. It’s that they will be more likely to make the assumption that their conduct will be viewed through the lens they are familiar with.

          If the intention is clarity then more clarity up front is always a plus.