damn. So this is how I find what the fox says

A better if silly usage of this meme would be something like the top panel staying the same but the bottom pane having them answer something else by saying:

“you shouldn’t judge people by their appearance”

Which would give it a clear inconsistency. By looking at the genitals you can judge someone’s tastes, but you shouldn’t judge people by their appearance? That doesn’t make sense.

In the original meme, the person in the second pane is pretty much just reiterating what they said in the first pane. In that case there’s no synergy, both panes could stand on their own.

But I’m pretty much just nitpicking lol

Isn’t this meme meant to show an inconsistency/hypocrisy in the line of thinking of the person in the right? In this case there’s pretty much no incosistency or even difference between what they say in the upper and lower part of the meme, it’s just that what they say is stupid

I’d say a society without dreams is far more fucked up than one without them. Kids don’t think about the contribution to society of what they want to be, they simply look up to the people who do it and think “I want to be like that”.

As in,

Have you ever had a dream that, that you, um, you had, your, you— you could, you’ll do, you— you wants, you, you could do so, you— you’ll do, you could- you, you want, you want them to do you so much you could do anything?

hmm I thought they leaned relatively against AI slop. Wouldn’t this be because they were working on it privately or something for quite some time?

Mmm I’m sorry but I’m going to have to disagree. Google’s results are still better than ddg, which sources them from bing. In my experience, it is even more susceptible to SEO spam than google, even though both are pretty bad.

To me, search engines with interesting results are more stuff like marginalia and mojeek, but those are niche and not really for most people. They also have a tendency to give results that have nothing to do with the query, which is sad :(

But then HOW would I write 🍳sexual??

What? What led you to conclude this? I didn’t read this specific article, but I watched the video and as far as I can remember the father says that he didn’t mean to do that, it was an accident and he acknowledges it as his fault

I’d say it’s fred and they forgot an l after sel

expels thousands of calories through (…) kids

is your brother a pregnant woman?

me when port 53 is already in use:

You silly, autism is the weather, not the place

what is the problem with gluetun?

Geography and common knowledge? I also had to learn the major rivers in my country as a kid

In overwatch EU servers (maybe in other similar games too), in my experience, in terms of pure toxicity hurled at you, having a french accent in comms manages to be even worse than having a female voice. Couldn’t help but smile this one time someone told me they wouldn’t be using the team comms because they were french. Amazing.

you might want to check ublacklist

140 + 100 + 180 + 100 + 30 does not equal 1350. Not even close. Impossible to put any kind of trust in AI slop

What does it mean to proxy a repository through the site?

Man, I used kagi for 2 months or so and stopped subscribing after that because while there wasn’t really anything that I’d seen that’d make me outright unsubscribe there were many things that I found odd and it didn’t make sense to pay so much for a product that I didn’t agree with all that much. For instance:

I was unable to remove yandex from my search because:

what makes it difficult to act on this is that Kagi does not save searches as a matter of privacy policy, and including more moving parts would make debugging search quality issues nearly impossible

• link here

Despite having so many AI features that barely fit into a search engine, such as a translator (slop frontend) and an entire browser?

It called itself “unprofitable” because search is so expensive while giving an honestly insane quota of AI use as far as I can understand (ex. if user pays 10$ for the kagi subscription: 10$ - 20% worth of tokens = 8$ total quota), giving 100 free searches with, as far as I could see, very little protection against burner emails (the translator seems to not need an account at all and it’s an llm frontend, so it shouldn’t be cheap), and it had many different views in many different places from me.

But all that made me do was hmmm and shrug it off. I mean, we’re different humans from different backgrounds, of course we’d hold different views.

But holy shit. Hoooooooly shit. That conversation about the GDPR in the article. What the fuck. What in the actual fuck did I just read there. The fact that the CEO emailed him an explanation despite him explicitly asking to not be emailed too. Bruh.

Thank you!